How does Learning work? Just imagine: Will your Imagination fly and strive in a place where you HAVE to be when learning, but NEVER WOULD CHOOSE to stay, if you had a choice? In 2018 a group of Australian architects started a most interesting survey on the influence of architectural design on education. On Learning of students as well as outcome and performances, wellbeing of students and teachers. The survey was targeted at educators across Australia. They wanted to gain insight directly from teachers and educators; to explore how current learning spaces are performing in terms of how flexible, healthy and inspiring they are; and understand what the key influences driving change are and, more importantly, should be. And the results were startling: - 75 % of the educators rather see an impact of learning space design on learning than pedagogy. - However, when asked what should drive change in learning environment, 75% of respondents said pedagogy should be the key driver. Thinking of design of space for joyful and challenging 21 century learning should be tailored to the context and culture of the school, and it should be for the people, by the people - or at least the learner. This implicates a strong collaboration of planners, architects, teachers and students during the design phase of any learning environment. So let’s not only talk about 21 century learning from a pedagogical angle. Space and ambiance matter! Architects and Educators both have a common responsibility for the learning of students. Let’s share insight and critical feedback between all people involved in school design. They are the key tenets for success when it comes to building a school that shall give room not to students as followers but to adventurers of every kind and their endeavours. Source: https://www.jdharchitects.com.au/index.php/2018/01/29/the-3-ps-of-school-design-people-pedagogy-and-place/
0 Comments
It has been a common observation that when schools are built, the emphasis on the finer correlations between pedagogy and infrastructure is missed out. Typically, school promoters emphasize on the construction of a school building which is just in compliance with a given board of affiliation. The directions given by the education boards or councils are generic, primarily containing the directives about the size of the school land, the area of the labs, playground, number of facilities and the size of the classroom. Then, as a measure to preclude crowding, maximum strength a class is fixed. Despite the competition between schools, the learning environment design does not find the place it deserves. Those who want to start a school and take school building as a brick and mortar construction with only quantitative not qualitative difference from any other sort of building, are not few. In the resulting scenario of sheer ignorance or compromise, ideas of ‘collaborative learning’, ‘interactive learning’ and campus experience turn into irrelevant terms with hardly any impact on teaching-learning practices of schools and boarding schools are no different from bunkers. We have seen that the school promoters often find it difficult to understand the emphasis that is placed on the master plan and architecture by the international education organizations.[….] We recommend school promoters to opt for school master plan, school architecture and school interior designing services from professional agencies with exclusive expertise in designing 21st-century learning environments. Vinod Kakumanu 2018 Read more: https://www.schoolserv.in/impact-of-school-architecture-and-master-plan-on-learning-outcomes/ |
HomeContact |
Services
Life School education model
|
References
Knightsbridge International School Morges (former LLIS)
|